4.7 Article

Supramolecular modification of Carbon Nanofibers with Poly(diallyl dimethylammonium) chloride and Triton X-100 for electrochemical application

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 43, 期 13, 页码 6575-6585

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.075

关键词

Carbon nanofibers; PDDA; Triton X-100; Supramolecular interactions; Inter-molecular charge transfer

资金

  1. SERB (DST), New Delhi [PDF/2015/000817]
  2. TEQIP-II grants (Dr SSB UICET)
  3. Human Resource Training Program for Regional Innovation and Creativity through the Ministry of Education
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2015H1C1A1034436]
  5. New and Renewable Energy of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) form the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Rebulic of Kore [20153010031920]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon nanofibers (CNF) exhibit special morphological features pertaining to their high aspect ratio. This work explores the polyelectrolyte (PDDA, Poly (diallyl dimethylammonium) chloride) wrapping on CNF and the interaction mechanism between them in the presence of a surfactant (octyl-phenol-ethoxylate (Triton X-100)). The wrapping has been achieved via a simple on/off ultrasonication methodology. PDDA behaves as a dispersing agent and an electron acceptor; the inter-molecular charge transfer takes place between CNF (electron donor) and PDDA, Triton X-100 works as a dispersing agent too but it affects pronouncedly the inter-molecular charge transfer. It has been observed that pi-pi, hydrophobic-hydrophilic, weak electrostatic, and van der Waals interactions all sum up to supramolecular interactions in CNF + PDDA + Triton X-100; leading to an augmented N content as compared to carbon nanotubes or graphene in a similar system. This system could work as the metal-free electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction in a Fuel cell. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据