4.7 Article

Modeling incompressible thermal flows using a central-moments-based lattice Boltzmann method

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.12.052

关键词

CLBM; Incompressible flows; Thermal flows

资金

  1. MOST National Key Research and Development Programme [2016YFB0600805]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620757]
  3. Center for Combustion Energy at Tsinghua University
  4. Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology
  5. ARCHER under EPSRC project UK Consortium on Mesoscale Engineering Sciences (UKCOMES) [EP/L00030X/1]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L00030X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/L00030X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a central-moments-based lattice Boltzmann method (CLBM) for incompressible thermal flows is proposed. In the method, the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations and the convection diffusion equation for the temperature field are solved separately by two different CLB equations. Through the Chapman-Enskog analysis, the macroscopic governing equations for incompressible thermal flows can be reproduced. The consistent forcing scheme (Fei and Luo, 2017) is adopted to incorporate forcing effect, and the implementation for CLBM is simplified by using simplified raw-moment sets. Compared with several D2Q5 multiple-relaxation-time(MRT) lattice Boltzmann methods for the temperature equation, the proposed method is shown to be better Galilean invariant through measuring the thermal diffusivities on a moving reference frame. Numerical simulations for several typical problems confirm the accuracy, efficiency, and stability of the present method. The grid convergence tests indicate that the proposed CLBM for incompressible thermal flows is of second-order accuracy in space. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据