4.7 Article

Numerical simulation of flow patterns and the effect on heat flux during R32 condensation in microtube

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.12.123

关键词

Condensation; Microtube; Flow pattern; Injection flow

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576106]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation for Creative Research Groups of China [51621062]
  3. UK-China Industry Academia Partnership Programme [UK-CIAPP\415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the fluid volume approach, a transient numerical model for the condensation heat transfer and flow features in a microchannel is proposed. The flow condensation of R32 in a circular microtube with 0.1 mm diameter was studied. Four typical flow patterns, annular, injection flow, slug flow and bubbly flow are simulated along a two-dimension calculational domain successively. The numerical mode is verified by the experiments from the literature. The numerical results discern that the increase of mass flux, wall temperature and saturation temperature affect the detachment point of vapor slug further toward the outlet with higher occurrence frequency, which can be attributed to the higher Weber number and Capillary number of tail vapor core respectively. The local heat flux and wall shear stress will decrease along the flow direction overall, and tend to be constant in the single phase liquid area. However, there exit some rebounds and oscillations of the local heat flux and wall shear stress during injection and slug flow. The transient oscillations of wall shear stress can induce fluctuations and even waves in the annular flow upstream, which can be concluded as surface tension force affecting upstream, is proposed based on the minimum potential energy theory. This mechanism could be a supplement for the traditional theory of flow pattern transition at high mass flux being induced by fluctuations which grow up while flowing downstream. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据