4.7 Article

Parametric study on the hydrocarbon fuel flow rate distribution and cooling effect in non-uniformly heated parallel cooling channels

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.124

关键词

Flow distribution; Parametric study; Parallel channels; Engine cooling; Design optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51606051, 51476044]
  2. Innovative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51421063]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission [JCYJ20160427184254731]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced aero-engines with higher flying Mach number, like SCRamjets, offer good solution to the hypersonic propulsion. However, the thermal boundary condition of the engine cooling channels is normally non-uniform, which may cause fuel mal-distribution. Serious fuel cooling capacity waste and even over-temperature may occur. To ensure the reasonable flow distribution and wall temperature, a parametric study of the cooling channel geometries is conducted under non-uniform thermal boundary condition. A 3D numerical model considering the flow and heat transfer under supercritical pressure in parallel cooling channels is developed and validated. The results indicate that the flow distribution and cooling effect both improve with the reasonable design of the channel geometry. Higher aspect ratio (AR) improves the flow distribution and cooling effect. The variations of rib thickness and total channel flow area show greater impact on the heat transfer performance than on the flow distribution. At last, the results of channel geometry optimization are validated under different heat flux distributions. It can be concluded that the channel geometry optimization in this work improves the flow distribution and lowers the wall temperature, which provides reference for the design of cooling channels in aero-engines like SCRamjets. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据