4.7 Article

Effect of surface roughness on pool boiling heat transfer of water on hydrophobic surfaces

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.124

关键词

Pool boiling; Surface roughness; Hydrophobic surface; Boiling heat transfer coefficient (BHTC); Critical heat flux (CHF)

资金

  1. International Collaborative Energy Technology R&D Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20178510000180]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20178510000180] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of surface roughness on the pool boiling of water on hydrophobic surfaces was investigated over the entire boiling regime, from the onset of nucleate boiling to film boiling. The hydrophobic surfaces were fabricated by coating a polytetrafluoroethylene layer on 10 x 10 mm(2) copper surfaces roughened by various sandpapers. The average roughness of the hydrophobic surfaces ranged from 0.042 to 1.54 mu m and the corresponding contact angles varied from 116 degrees to 153 degrees. Boiling heat transfer coefficients (BHTC) for the rough surfaces were initially high, but decreased rapidly as the heat flux increased, whereas the BHTC5 for the smooth surfaces slowly increased to reach their maximum values and then decreased. The variation in BHTC was explained in terms of the number of nucleation sites and vapor blanketing on the boiling surface, which were related to both the roughness and contact angle. An empirical critical heat flux (CHF) correlation, which showed a 12.2% mean absolute error with the present data, was proposed. Inclusion of the current CHF data for the hydrophobic region provided a complete understanding of the effect of surface roughness and wettability on the CHF in pool boiling of water. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据