4.6 Article

How many days are enough?: capturing routine human mobility

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1434888

关键词

Activity spaces; Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence; Global Positioning Systems (GPS)

资金

  1. National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NIGMS) [5R01GM108731]
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2015-06318]
  3. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [895-2012-1023]
  4. NSERC [356043-2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wedding mobile phone sensor technology and human spatial behaviour has great potential. The ubiquity of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology has made gathering data about human mobility simpler, more precise, and with higher fidelity, providing minute-by-minute records of the locations of cohorts from dozens of participants. While this data provides a strong basis for Geographic Information Science research, it also constitutes an invasion of the participants' privacy and can provide more information than researchers require to answer their questions. As an ethical and practical consideration, researchers should gather only as much data as they need. In this paper, we take three weeks of GPS traces from over a hundred student participants in mobile phone-based tracking studies and show that fewer than 14days of data is necessary to establish complete activity spaces. We define complete' as the point at which marginal information gains become negligible according to a pairwise temporal analysis of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence of the spatial (bivariate) histogram through time. For the fixed level of information difference, observable in the data, impacts due to individual variability, population composition, and spatial resolution are evident. However, all populations at each level of resolution examined in the paper demonstrated convergence to low divergence levels occurred within a matter of days, and to negligible information gain in less than two weeks. The methods described in the paper represent a novel metric useful to understand the interaction between measurements and information in human mobility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据