4.3 Article

Analysis of contaminated milk with organochlorine pesticide residues using gas chromatography

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 878-890

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2018.1460607

关键词

Milk; Organochlorine pesticides; Gas chromatography mass spectrometry; DDT; DDE; -HCH; -Endosulphan; -Endosulphan; Endosulphan sulphate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Milk and milk products are considered to have tremendous nutritional values as they contain a good proportion of protein, fats, and important minerals. However, the nutritional value of the milk produced in Pakistan is not up to the mark as extensive use of pesticides on crops resulted in contamination of milk. Consumption of contaminated food such as milk, meat, fish, eggs can induce increased proportion of organochlorine pesticides in the body. The purpose of this study is to determine organochlorine pesticide residues in milk and their toxicity level by Maximum Residues Level (MRL) values. In the current study, organochlorines such as Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDE), Dieldrin, Gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (?-HCH) also known as Lindane, -Endosulphan, -Endosulphan and Endosulphan sulphate were detected with the help of gas chromatograph equipped with electron detector. These pesticides were confirmed by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Analysis of variance is applied (ANOVA) to determine variations of pesticides in all milk samples. Analysis showed non-significant results (p>0.05) with large variation among all milk samples regarding pesticide residues. The mean values of DDT, DDE were found to be below the MRL value. The mean values of Dieldrin, ?-HCH were also below MRL value. On the other hand mean values of -Endosulphan, -Endosulphan, and Endosulphan sulphate were slightly higher than MRL in few milk points. The present study showed large variations of pesticides residues present in milk samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据