4.7 Article

EBSD analysis of cyclic load effect on final misorientation distribution of post-mortem low alloy steel: A new method for fatigue crack tip driving force prediction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 264-276

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.016

关键词

EBSD analysis; Low alloy steel; Low cycle fatigue; Crack propagation; Delta K prediction

资金

  1. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Japan
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11572171, 11632010, 11672151, U1533134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of applied cyclic load, including the maximum plastic strain epsilon(p)(max) and the plastic strain amplitude epsilon(p)(a) on final misorientation level of post-mortem low alloy steel after low cycle fatigue (LCF) test, was analyzed by Electron Back-Scattered Diffraction (EBSD) in this research at first. Two misorientation parameters widely used in EBSD analysis, Kernel Average Misorientation (KAM) and Grain Reference Orientation Deviation (GROD), are compared in terms of accumulated plasticity characterization after LCF failure, where a bilinear function is found between final KAM and applied cyclic load epsilon(p)(max) & epsilon(p)(a). Then the cyclic load effect on final misorientation distribution of post-mortem low alloy steel after fatigue crack propagation (FCP) test was further analyzed by EBSD based on the above bilinear function between final KAM and epsilon(p)(max) & epsilon(p)(a), as well as the equivalent (epsilon) over bar (p)(max) & Delta(epsilon) over bar (p) distribution functions given by HRR field. - 1/2 power law is established to describe final KAM distribution near crack path. The area S-KAM between final KAM distribution curve and undeformed KAM(0) base line within a certain range, rather than S-GROD, is proposed as a better measurement of fatigue crack tip driving force Delta K in constant load ratio R condition. Meanwhile, the influence of load ratio R on final misorientation distribution is also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据