4.5 Article

Activated carbons from banana peels for the removal of nickel ions

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-018-1676-0

关键词

Activated carbon; Nickel; Adsorption; Banana peels; Hydrothermal treatment; Pyrolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work aims the study of two types of activated carbons, produced with hydrothermal treatment (BAC-H samples) and pyrolysis (BAC-P samples) using from banana peels as source. The activation was done with H3PO4 (at three different temperatures 400, 500, 600 degrees C) in order to examine the effect of this time differentiation. The samples prepared a brief characterization which was also presented observing the morphology of the carbon samples with SEM images and their specific surface area (BET analysis). The adsorption ability of the prepared activated carbons was extensively evaluated using as model pollutant nickel ions. Adsorption experiments were realized to evaluate the optimum solution pH (6). Detailed equilibrium analysis was done running three isotherm models for the fitting of equilibrium data (Langmuir, Freundlich and Langmuir-Freundlich equations). The equilibrium data were repeated similarly at four different temperatures (20, 30, 40, 50 degrees C) in order to result the respective thermodynamic evaluation of this system. Generally, the adsorption capacity of pyrolized carbons was higher than that of hydrothermal ones; this slight difference may be attributed to the different surface area (slightly higher of pyrolized 415-488m(2)/g than of hydrothermal 315-320m(2)/g). Furthermore, in the pyrolized carbons, the increase in temperature drastically improved (30%) the Q(max) of BAC400-P from 229 (20 degrees C) to 299 (50 degrees C). Based on the fact that four different temperatures were examined in equilibrium, the respective thermodynamic analysis was done in order to export some very important parameters as enthalpy, entropy and free energy for the system (H degrees, G degrees, S degrees).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据