期刊
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 1571-1591出版社
ACAD MANAGEMENT
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2012.0644
关键词
-
Although considerable research has focused on employee reactions to organizational justice, far less research has examined why managers adhere to rules of justice in the first place. Taking a proactive approach to organizational justice, we address this void by examining managerial motives for adhering to distributive, procedural, informational, and interpersonal rules of justice on a day-to-day basis. Results of an experience-sampling study of 90 managers who completed daily surveys over a three-week period revealed that both cold cognitive (i.e., effecting compliance, identity maintenance, and establishing fairness) and hot affective (i.e., high positive affect and low negative affect) motives were associated with managerial adherence to justice rules. Moreover, cold motives were more strongly associated with justice rule adherence for justice dimensions over which managers perceived less discretion, while hot motives were more strongly associated with justice rule adherence for justice dimensions over which managers perceived greater discretion. We discuss the implications of our findings for both theory and practice.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据