4.3 Article

Heterogeneous Information Network Embedding based Personalized Query-Focused Astronomy Reference Paper Recommendation

出版社

ATLANTIS PRESS
DOI: 10.2991/ijcis.11.1.44

关键词

Heterogeneous information; network embedding; personalized query-oriented reference paper recommendation; distributed representation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772429]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M613205, 2017M623241]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102016QD009, 3102016QD010]
  4. Basic Research Project - Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [201703063000511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fast-growing scientific papers bring the problem of rapidly and accurately finding a list of reference papers for a given manuscript. Reference paper recommendation is an essential technology to overcome this obstacle. In this paper, we study the problem of personalized query-focused astronomy reference paper recommendation and propose a heterogeneous information network embedding based recommendation approach. In particular, we deem query researchers, query text, papers and authors of the papers as vertices and construct a heterogeneous information network based on these vertices. Then we propose a heterogeneous information network embedding (HINE) approach, which simultaneously captures intra-relationships among homogeneous vertices, interrelationships among heterogeneous vertices and correlations between vertices and text contents, to model different types of vertices as vector formats in a unified vector space. The relevance of the query, the papers and the authors of the papers are then measured by the distributed representations. Finally, the papers which have high relevance scores are presented to the researcher as recommendation list. The effectiveness of the proposed HINE based recommendation approach is demonstrated by the recommendation evaluation conducted on the IOP astronomy journal database.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据