4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Climatic or tectonic control on organic matter deposition in the South China Sea? A lesson learned from a comprehensive Neogene palynological study of IODP Site U1433

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 166-177

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.10.003

关键词

Organic matters; Tectonics; Monsoon; Driving forces; Neogene

资金

  1. U.S. Science Support Program to Louisiana State University
  2. NSFC [41290252, 41772181]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. CENEX
  5. Charles T. McCord Jr. Chair in Petroleum Geology
  6. USSAC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Palynomorphs and other organic particles are basic key components of palynofacies, yet quantitative analyses of all types are rarely used together to investigate organic matter assemblage changes and evaluate the driving forces behind the observed changes. In this paper, eight organic-walled microfossil and particle morphologies (sporopollen, Pediastrum, Concentricystes, fungi, dinoflagellate cysts, structured/amorphous organic matters, stomatal apparatus and scolecodonts) are tabulated and their concentrations and fluxes are evaluated over the past 17 million years (Ma) in sediments recovered from the South China Sea at International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Site U1433. Overall, these morphologies show roughly similar increasing trends but with different levels of fluctuations. The uniform increase in all morphologies at 8 Ma (named the 8 Ma event) is the most notable feature of the past 17 Ma. To explain the trend, and because these various organic matters reflect various environmental conditions, we argue that the uniformity of the signal implies that tectonically-driven basin and drainage evolution played the key role, rather than paleoclimate (Asian summer monsoon). The similar to 8 Ma event was likely triggered by the onset of the Mekong River in its present location, although the role of monsoon evolution cannot be excluded completely.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据