4.7 Article

Evaluation of trace elements in US coals using the USGS COALQUAL database version 3.0. Part I: Rare earth elements and yttrium (REY)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 1-13

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2018.04.004

关键词

Coal; COALQUAL; Lanthanides; Rare earth elements; Yttrium

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coal is a potential source of valuable elements such as rare earth elements and yttrium (REY). In this work, REY concentrations in U.S. domestic coals were evaluated using data from the USGS COALQUAL Database Version 3.0. The database contains a total of 7657 non-weathered, full-bed coal samples. The number of samples containing REY data points varies among elements. Assessment of data quality indicates that some of the REY data are semi-quantitative and should be used with caution. Different analytical instruments and methods with varying accuracies and precisions are thought to be the main sources of errors. Inclusion of qualified data also accounts for the sawtooth pattern of the UCC-normalized REY distribution. A new set of Q factor values was thus proposed to adjust qualified data. Consequently, mean concentrations of REY in U.S. coals were obtained with a total REY concentration of 65.5 ppm on a moisture-free whole coal basis. Further evaluation of REY in 5378 selected coal samples indicates that about 9-13% of the samples fall into the combined category of promising and highly promising coals for REY, according to the classification of Dal et al. (2017). Taking sampling bias into consideration, we further found that bituminous coal, particularly from the central Appalachian region, has the highest probability of being a source for beneficial recovery of REY. More specifically, bituminous coal from eastern Kentucky is likely to be the best option. Finally, we conclude that U.S. domestic coal is a promising, alternative source for beneficial recovery of REY to meet the U.S. REY demand for economic growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据