4.6 Article

THE LINK BETWEEN LIGHT AND MASS IN LATE-TYPE SPIRAL GALAXY DISKS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 797, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/797/2/L28

关键词

galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: spiral

资金

  1. Netherlands Research School for Astronomy (NOVA)
  2. [NSF/AST-1009471]
  3. [OISE-754437]
  4. [614.000.807]
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1009471] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the correlation between the extrapolated central disk surface brightness (mu) and extrapolated central surface mass density (S) for galaxies in the DiskMass sample. This mu-Sigma relation has a small scatter of 30% at the high surface brightness (HSB) end. At the low surface brightness (LSB) end, galaxies fall above the mu-Sigma relation, which we attribute to their higher dark matter content. After correcting for the dark matter as well as for the contribution of gas and the effects of radial gradients in the disk, the LSB end falls back on the linear mu-Sigma relation. The resulting scatter around the corrected mu-Sigma relation is 25% at the HSB end and about 50% at the LSB end. The intrinsic scatter in the mu-Sigma relation is estimated to be 10%-20%. Thus, if mu(K, 0) is known, the stellar surface mass density is known to within 10%-20% (random error). Assuming disks have an exponential vertical distribution of mass, the average Upsilon(K)* is 0.24 M-circle dot/L-circle dot, with an intrinsic scatter around the mean of at most 0.05 M-circle dot/L-circle dot. This value for Upsilon(K)* is 20% smaller than we found in Martinsson et al., mainly due to the correction for dark matter applied here. This small scatter means that among the galaxies in our sample, variations in scale height, vertical density profile shape, and/or the ratio of vertical over radial velocity dispersion must be small.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据