4.7 Article

Biflavones from Ginkgo biloba as novel pancreatic lipase inhibitors: Inhibition potentials and mechanism

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.085

关键词

Pancreatic lipase; Ginkgo biloba; Inhibitory effects

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1700200, 2017YFC1702000]
  2. NSF of China [81473181, 81773687, 81703604, 81672961, 81573501]
  3. Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader [18XD1403600]
  4. Innovative Entrepreneurship Program of High-level Talents in Dalian [2016RQ025, 2017RQ121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduction of lipid absorption has been recognized as an attractive approach for the discovery of new drugs to treat obesity and overweight. The leave extract of Ginkgo biloba has been widely used for the treatment of metabolic diseases (such as hyperlipidemia) in both eastern and western countries, but the bioactive compounds in Ginkgo biloba and the underlying mechanism have not been fully characterized. This study aimed to investigate the inhibition potentials and mechanism of major biflavones from G. biloba on pancreatic lipase (PL), a key target regulating lipid absorption. The results clearly demonstrated that all tested biflavones in G. biloba including isoginkgetin, bilobetin, ginkgetin and sciadopitysin, displayed strong to moderate inhibitory effects on PL with the IC50 values ranging from 2.90 mu M to 12.78 mu M. Further investigations on both inhibition kinetic analyses and docking simulations demonstrated that isoginkgetin, bilobetin and ginkgetin were potent PL inhibitors (K-i <2.5 mu M), which could create strong interactions with the catalytic triad of PL via hydrogen bonding. These findings provided a new powerful evidence for explaining the hypolipidemic effects of G. biloba, while these newly identified PL inhibitors from G. biloba could serve as lead compounds for the development of biflavonoid-type PL inhibitors. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据