4.7 Article

Development of various composition multicomponent chitosan/fish collagen/glycerin 3D porous scaffolds: Effect on morphology, mechanical strength, biostability and cytocompatibility

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.136

关键词

Multicomponent scaffolds; 3D porous scaffolds; Microstructure; Mechanical properties; Cytocompatibility; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under FRGS Grant [2013-0187-102-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The various composition multicomponent chitosan/fish collagen/glycerin 3D porous scaffolds were developed and investigated the effect of various composition chitosan/fish collagen/glycerin on scaffolds morphology, mechanical strength, biostability and cytocompatibility. The scaffolds were fabricated via freeze-drying technique. The effects of various compositions consisting in 3D scaffolds were investigated via FT-IR analysis, porosity, swelling and mechanical tests, and effect on the morphology of scaffolds investigated microscopically. The biostability and cytocompatibility tests were used to explore the ability of scaffolds to use for tissue engineering application. The average pore sizes of scaffolds were in range of 100.73 +/- 27.62-116.01 +/- 52.06, porosity 71.72 +/- 3.46-91.17 +/- 2.42%, tensile modulus in dry environment 1.47 +/- 0.08-0.17 +/- 0.03 MPa, tensile modulus in wet environment 032 +/- 0.03-0.14 +/- 0.04 MPa and biodegradation rate (at day 30) 60.38 +/- 0.70-83.48 +/- 0.28%. In vitro culture of human fibroblasts and keratinocytes showed that the various composition multicomponent 3D scaffolds were good cytocompatibility however, the scaffolds contained high amount of fish collagen excellently facilitated cell proliferation and adhesion. It was found that the high amount fish collagen and glycerin scaffolds have high porosity, enough mechanical strength and biostability, and excellent cytocompatibility. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据