4.7 Article

Poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate)-functionalized magnetic composite particles: A biofriendly support for lipase immobilization

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.150

关键词

Lipase; Poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate); Immobilization; Magnetic composite particle

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21606165, 21621004]
  2. National Natural Science Funds for Excellent Young Scholars [21422605]
  3. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [17JCQNJC05600]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130032120089]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate) as an extremely hydrophilic polymer was modified on superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (pCB-Fe3O4), which were employed to immobilize porcine pancreatic lipase. The properties of immobilized lipase were investigated in comparison with the free enzyme counterpart. Enzymatic stability, reusability, and activity of the immobilized lipase were found significantly superior to that of the free lipase. In particular, at an elevated temperature of 60 degrees C, the immobilized lipase retained 50% of its initial activity after 150 min, while the free enzyme displayed only one-third activity of the immobilized enzyme. Besides, the immobilized lipase retained >60% of its initial activity after 7 cycles. Furthermore, the value of K-cat/K-m indicated the catalytic efficiency of the immobilized lipase was increased by 50% compared to that of the free one. The pCB-Fe3O4 particles displayed non-cytotoxicity, while the naked Fe3O4 particles caused only 50% viability of NIH 3T3 cells. These results showed that pCB-Fe3O4 composite particles had higher efficiency and improved stability for lipase immobilization, which are more promising for industrial scale up of biocatalytic systems with excellent biocompatibility. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据