4.7 Article

Influence of carrageenan molecular structures on electromechanical behaviours of poly(3-hexylthiophene)/carrageenan conductive hydrogels

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.066

关键词

Carrageenan; Hydrogel; Poly(3-hexylthiophene); Electromechanical properties

资金

  1. Conductive and Electroactive Polymers Research Unit (CEAP)
  2. CU 2nd Century Grant of Chulalongkom University
  3. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  4. Royal Thai Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kappa, iota, and lambda carrageenans were fabricated by solution casting as soft and electrically responsive actuators. The poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) was added as a dispersed phase to improve the electrical and electromechanical properties of the pristine carrageenan hydrogels. The electromechanical properties of the carrageenan hydrogels were investigated under the effects of electric field strength, carrageenan type namely kappa, iota, and lambda, operating temperature, and P3HT concentration. The electromechanical responses of the pristine carrageenans increased with increasing sulfated groups present; the lambda-carragenan hydrogel provided the highest storage modulus sensitivity of 4.0 under applied electric field strength of 800 V/mm. With increasing temperature, the double-helical structure of the kappa-carrageenan hydrogel changed into a random coil leading to the increase in the storage modulus response. On the other hand, the P3HT/kappa-carrageenan hydrogel blend at 0.10%v/v P3HT provided the high storage modulus sensitivity of 2.20 at the electric field strength of 800 V/mm. The higher dielectrophoretic forces were due to the additional P3HT electronic polarization, but lower deflections relative to those of the pristine kappa-carrageenan hydrogel. Both kappa- and lambda-carrageenans with the double helical structures are shown here as possible candidates to be fabricated as electroactive hydrogels for actuator or biomedical applications. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据