4.7 Article

Thermostabilization of a thermophilic 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme through C-terminal truncation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.020

关键词

1,4-alpha-Glucan branching enzyme; Truncation parts of C-terminus; Thermostability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771935, 31722040]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51617B]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560394, 2016790420]
  4. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [1401100C]
  5. program of Collaborative innovation center of food safety and quality control in Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermophilic proteins are useful for the detailed investigation of thermostability because they function efficiently at high temperatures. Comparison of the amino acid sequences and three-dimensional structures of mesophilic and thermophilic 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzymes (GBEs) shows that the amino acid sequence of the last 26 residues at the C-terminal end of the GBE from Geobacillus therrnoglucosidans STB02 (GBE(Gt), GenBank accession no. KJ660983) are not conserved, and that their 3-dimensional structure is flexible. These residues appear to be modified based upon a balance between flexibility and rigidity that is related to thermostability. In this study, a truncated mutant of GBE(Gt) made by removing the last 26 residues from its C-terminal end was found to have increased thermostability and solubility, compared with the wild-type enzyme. Additionally, truncation of a portion of the C-terminus resulted in a decrease in aqueous stability. The circular dichroism spectra of GBE(Gt) and GBE(Gt)Delta C were also found to be different. These results suggest that deletion of flexible residues at the C-terminal end of GBE(Gt), which are located on the surface of the enzyme, enhances the thermostability of the enzyme without significantly compromising its enzymatic activity. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据