4.6 Review

A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2

关键词

Physical activity; Measurement; Assessment; Accelerometry; Questionnaires; Self-report; Motion sensors; Pedometers; Heart rate monitors; Adults

资金

  1. DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity (DEDIPAC) knowledge hub
  2. Joint Programming Initiative 'Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life'
  3. Health Research Board (HRB) of Ireland
  4. Germany: Project Management Agency in the German Aerospace Centre (PT-DLR)
  5. Italy: Ministry of Education, University and Research/Ministry of Agriculture Food and Forestry Policies
  6. The Netherlands: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)
  7. Norway: The Research Council of Norway, Division for Society and Health
  8. Poland: The National Centre for Research and Development
  9. The United Kingdom: The Medical Research Council (MRC)
  10. MRC [MC_U106179473, MC_UU_12015/3] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12015/3, MC_U106179473] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The links between increased participation in Physical Activity (PA) and improvements in health are well established. As this body of evidence has grown, so too has the search for measures of PA with high levels of methodological effectiveness (i.e. validity, reliability and responsiveness to change). The aim of this review of reviews was to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodological effectiveness of currently employed measures of PA, to aid researchers in their selection of an appropriate tool. A total of 63 review articles were included in this review, and the original articles cited by these reviews were included in order to extract detailed information on methodological effectiveness. Self-report measures of PA have been most frequently examined for methodological effectiveness, with highly variable findings identified across a broad range of behaviours. The evidence-base for the methodological effectiveness of objective monitors, particularly accelerometers/activity monitors, is increasing, with lower levels of variability observed for validity and reliability when compared to subjective measures. Unfortunately, responsiveness to change across all measures and behaviours remains under-researched, with limited information available. Other criteria beyond methodological effectiveness often influence tool selection, including cost and feasibility. However, researchers must be aware of the methodological effectiveness of any measure selected for use when examining PA. Although no perfect tool for the examination of PA in adults exists, it is suggested that researchers aim to incorporate appropriate objective measures, specific to the behaviours of interests, when examining PA in free-living environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据