期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 39-55出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.05.004
关键词
Argumentation; Weighted bipolar graphs; Semantics
资金
- [ANR-13-BS02-0004]
- [ANR-11-LABX-0040-CIMI]
The paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argumentation graphs (i.e., graphs whose arguments have basic strengths, and may be both supported and attacked). We introduce principles that an evaluation method (or semantics) could satisfy. Such principles are very useful for understanding the foundations of semantics, judging them, and comparing semantics. We then analyze existing semantics on the basis of our principles, and finally propose a new semantics for the class of acyclic graphs. We show that it satisfies all the principles. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据