4.7 Article

Startup and transport characteristics of oscillating heat pipe using ionic liquids

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.03.004

关键词

Ionic liquids; Oscillating heat pipe (OHP); Startup; Pulsation characteristics; Thermal performance

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51236002]
  2. Program of National Natural Science of China [21606034, 21466029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper attempted to investigate the effects of ionic liquids (ILs) addition on the startup, operation and thermal performance of a closed loop copper oscillating heat pipe (OHP, four turns). The liquid slug oscillation characteristics and flow pattern of the OHP with various heat input were also experimentally examined utilizing high-speed camera. The experimental results showed that for higher ILs mass fractions, the OHP behaved a lower startup power (decrease of 29 W) and startup temperature (decrease of 11 C), which are favorable of not only facilitating a faster startup of the OHP but also effectively avoiding the dry-out problem. When the mass fraction of ILs was 0.67%, the ILs-water based OHP substantially had the same amplitude and the velocity as water-based OHP. When the ILs addition was respectively 19.1% and 44.4% (mass fraction), the oscillation liquid slug displayed a high frequency and small amplitude characteristics. In case of a low mass fraction of ILs, ILs-water based OHP nearly perform the same heat transfer performance as the water based OHP presented. However, the heat transfer performance of the ILs-water based OHP showed a slight decrease of 10% at higher heat input (>220 W), which in general did not affect the overall thermal performance and operational stability of the OHP. A modified correlation of Kutateladze number (Ku) was established and could basically predict the thermal performance within approximately 10% deviation in the vertical closed loop OHP at a filling ratio around 65% considering the effects of ILs addition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据