4.7 Article

Tb-dependent phase transitions in Fe-Ga functional alloys

期刊

INTERMETALLICS
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 55-62

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2017.10.017

关键词

Functional alloys (magnetostrictive); Microalloying; Magnetic properties; Phase transformation; Microstructure; Diffraction (neutron)

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effect of microalloying by Tb on the microstructure, phase transitions, and functional properties of the Fe-19Ga-xTb and Fe-27.4Ga-xTb (where x = 0, 0.15, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 at.%) alloys was investigated by several techniques including in-situ neutron diffraction, X-ray diffraction (XRD), SEM-EBSD, magnetic measurements, and mechanical spectroscopy (internal friction). We could establish a microstructural understanding to figure out why doping with the trace amounts of Tb leads to an enhanced magnetostriction in the Fe-27.4Ga alloy up to 242 ppm. Our results demonstrate that the microalloying of Fe-27.4Ga with Tb significantly suppresses the formation of the phases with close-packed L1(2) and D0(19) structures and stabilizes the dominant phase with D0(3) structure. The L1(2) has negative magnetostriction compared to positive magnetostriction of the D0(3) matrix; therefore, the lower the volume fraction of the L1(2) is the higher the saturation magnetostriction at room temperature is. The influence of Tb on decelerating the kinetics of the phase transitions in the Fe-27Ga alloys can be reasonably explained by considering a possible competition between precipitation of the Tb-enriched phase and the nucleation of the L1(2) at the grain boundaries. Both Tb-enriched and the L1(2) prefer D0(3) grain boundaries for their nucleation as demonstrated by EBSD analysis. Nevertheless, the Tb-enriched phase already precipitates during casting, and therefore, at subsequent annealing, these precipitations prevent the nucleation of the L1(2) on the grain boundaries of the as-cast (D0(3)) structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据