4.4 Article

Protective Effect of D-Methionine on Body Weight Loss, Anorexia, and Nephrotoxicity in Cisplatin-Induced Chronic Toxicity in Rats

期刊

INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 813-824

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1534735417753543

关键词

cisplatin; D-methionine; anorexia; nephrotoxicity; chemotherapy

资金

  1. Chung Shan Medical University [CSMU-CCH-104-01, CSMU-JAH-106-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

D-methionine is a sulfur-containing amino acid that can act as a potent antioxidant. Anorexia and nephrotoxicity are side effects of cisplatin. The protective effects of D-methionine on cisplatin-induced anorexia and renal injury were investigated. The model of chronic cisplatin administration (5 mg/kg body weight) involved intraperitoneal injection on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral D-methionine (300 mg/kg body weight) coadministration daily for 20 days. On the 21st day of treatment, food intake and body weight in the cisplatin-treated group significantly decreased by 52% and 31%, respectively, when compared with a control group. D-methionine coadministration with cisplatin decreased food intake and body weight by 29% and 8%, respectively. In cisplatin-treated rats, white blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, and platelet values significantly decreased, while mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration significantly increased by 8.6% when compared with control rats. Cisplatin administration resulted in significantly decreased feeding efficiency, elevated renal oxidative stress, and reduced antioxidative activity. Leukocyte infiltration, tubule vacuolization, tubular expansion, and swelling were observed in the kidneys of cisplatin-treated rats. Oral D-methionine exhibited an antianorexic effect, with improvement in food intake, feeding efficiency, and hematological toxicities, as well as a protective effect against nephrotoxicity by elevated antioxidative activity. D-methionine may serve as a chemoprotectant in patients receiving cisplatin as part of a chemotherapy regimen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据