4.6 Article

Carbon footprint of rice production under biochar amendment - a case study in a Chinese rice cropping system

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 148-159

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12248

关键词

biochar; carbon footprint; CH4; life cycle assessment; N2O; rice

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NFSC-41171191, 41105100]
  2. Science and Technology Supporting Project of China [2013BAD11B01]
  3. Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-409]
  4. Jiangsu Province [BE2013451]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a controversial strategy to mitigate global warming, biochar application into soil highlights the need for life cycle assessment before large-scale practice. This study focused on the effect of biochar on carbon footprint of rice production. A field experiment was performed with three treatments: no residue amendment (Control), 6 t ha(-1) yr(-1) corn straw (CS) amendment, and 2.4 t ha(-1) yr(-1) corn straw-derived biochar amendment (CBC). Carbon footprint was calculated by considering carbon source processes (pyrolysis energy cost, fertilizer and pesticide input, farmwork, and soil greenhouse gas emissions) and carbon sink processes (soil carbon increment and energy offset from pyrolytic gas). On average over three consecutive rice-growing cycles from year 2011 to 2013, the CS treatment had a much higher carbon intensity of rice (0.68 kg CO2-C equivalent (CO2-C-e) kg(-1) grain) than that of Control (0.24 kg CO2-C-e kg(-1) grain), resulting from large soil CH4 emissions. Biochar amendment significantly increased soil carbon pool and showed no significant effect on soil total N2O and CH4 emissions relative to Control; however, due to a variation in net electric energy input of biochar production based on different pyrolysis settings, carbon intensity of rice under CBC treatment ranged from 0.04 to 0.44 kg CO2-C-e kg(-1) grain. The results indicated that biochar strategy had the potential to significantly reduce the carbon footprint of crop production, but the energy-efficient pyrolysis technique does matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据