4.7 Article

Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in wire-guided cannulation for therapeutic biliary ERCP

期刊

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 119-126

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) was reported to decrease post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), but risk factors for PEP in WGC are not fully elucidated. Objective: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of PEP in WGC. Design: Single-center retrospective study. Setting: Academic center. Patients: A total of 800 consecutive patients with a native papilla. Interventions: Biliary therapeutic ERCP by using WGC. Main Outcome Measurements: The rate of PEP and its risk factors. Results: Biliary cannulation was successful by using WGC alone in 70.5%, and the final cannulation rate was 96.1%. Unintentional guidewire insertion and contrast material injection into the pancreatic duct (PD) during cannulation occurred in 55.3% and 21.8%, respectively. The incidence of PEP was 9.5% (mild 5.6%, moderate 2.9%, severe 1.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed a common bile duct (CBD) diameter of! 9 mm (odds ratio [OR] 2.03; P = .006) and unintentional guidewire insertion into the PD (OR 2.25; P = .014) as risk factors for PEP. PD opacification was not a risk factor for PEP (OR 1.15; P = .642), but the incremental increase of the PEP rate was seen in patients with CBDs < 9 mm: 4.6% without any PD manipulation, 8.3% with contrast material alone, 16.9% with guidewire alone, and 22.1% with both contrast material and guidewire. Limitations: Retrospective design in a single center. Conclusion: Unintentional PD manipulation was not uncommon in WGC. Guidewire insertion into the PD and a small CBD were risk factors for PEP in biliary therapeutic ERCP with the use of WGC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据