4.7 Article

Noninnocent Ligand in Rhodiurn(III)-Complex-Catalyzed C-H Bond Amination with Tosyl Azide

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 57, 期 16, 页码 9738-9747

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00289

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [2408, JP24109015]
  2. CREST, JST [161052502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six-coordinate rhodium(III) complexes coordinated by a planar trianionic ligand (L3-) are synthesized. One of the axial positions is occupied by chloride (Cl-), bromide (Br-), or iodide (I-), and another axial position is coordinated by a solvent molecule such as acetonitrile (AN), water (H2O), tetrahydrofuran (THF), or pyridine (PY) to complete an octahedral rhodium(III) center; [Rh-III(L3-)(X)(Y)](-) (1(X/Y); X = Cl-, Br-, or I-, Y = AN, H2O, THF, or PY). Coordination of the AN, H2O, and THF ligands to the metal center is rather weak, so that these solvent molecules are easily replaced by PY to give [Rh-III(L3-)(Cl)(PY)](-). In the electrochemical measurements, all complexes have two reversible redox couples based on the ligand-centered oxidation L3- to L center dot 2- and to L-, as reflected by the very similar redox potentials regardless of the different axial ligands. The rhodium(III) complexes catalyze C-H bond amination of xanthene with tosyl azide (TsN3). Because the yields of the arninated product are nearly the same among the complexes, replacement of the axial solvent ligands with TsN3 readily occurs to give a nitrene-radical-bound rhodium(III) complex, [Rh-III(L center dot 2-)((NTs)-Ts-center dot)(X)](-), as an active oxidant, which is generated by one-electron transfer from the trianionic L3- to the nitrene nitrogen atom. Generation of such a diradical intermediate was substantiated by the direct reaction of 1(Cl/AN) with TsN3 in the absence of the substrate (xanthene). In this case, a rhodium(III) iminosemiquinone complex, 2, was generated by the intramolecular reaction between the nitrene-radical moiety and the radical moiety of the ligand L center dot 2-.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据