4.3 Article

Filifactor alocis manipulates human neutrophils affecting their ability to release neutrophil extracellular traps induced by PMA

期刊

INNATE IMMUNITY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 210-220

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1753425918767507

关键词

Filifactor alocis; human neutrophils; neutrophil extracellular trap formation; immunomodulation; oral pathogens

资金

  1. NIH/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) [DE024509, DE011111, DE012505, DE017921]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE012505, R01DE024509, R37DE011111, R01DE011111] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutrophils operate at the site of injury or inflammation in the periodontal pocket to ensure periodontal health and clearance of bacterial pathogens. Filifactor alocis is recently identified as a potential periodontal pathogen, and in this study, we assessed the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), in response to the presence of the organism. NET formation by human neutrophils was not induced when challenged with F. alocis, independent of opsonization, viability, time, or bacterial dose. F. alocis also failed to induce NETs from TNF--primed neutrophils and did not induce the release of extracellular neutrophil elastase. However, significant NET induction was observed when neutrophils were challenged with Streptococcus gordonii or Peptoanaerobacter stomatis, In addition, co-infection studies revealed that the presence of F. alocis with S. gordonii or P. stomatis does not enhance or reduce NETs. Additionally, F. alocis failed to impact pre-formed NETs induced by either S. gordonii or P. stomatis. Pretreatment with F. alocis prior to stimulation with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), S. gordonii, or P. stomatis revealed that the bacterium is capable of reducing only PMA but not S. gordonii or P. stomatis NET formation. These results indicate that F. alocis manipulates neutrophils, inhibiting the triggering of NET induction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据