4.7 Article

Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 465, 期 -, 页码 105-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.002

关键词

Hesitant fuzzy envelopment analysis; Dual form; Efficiency value; Preference relationship; Alternative improvement

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71561026, 71771155]
  2. Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Commission of Yunnan Province [2017FB102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the hesitant fuzzy decision-making process, an important issue is to aggregate the hesitant fuzzy information and select the optimal alternatives. How to deal with other non optimal alternatives? This question has not been clearly answered. To address this issue, this paper proposes the hesitant fuzzy envelopment analysis (HFEA) model based on the defined score per unit. Furthermore, we develop the deviation-oriented hesitant fuzzy envelopment analysis (DHFEA) model and the score-oriented hesitant fuzzy envelopment analysis (SHFEA) model in terms of score and deviation values. Then, their dual forms are derived so that the DHFEA and SHFEA models can be transformed into the linear programming. Based on the calculated results, the non-optimal alternatives can be improved accordingly. Moreover, with respect to the attributes' differences, this paper constructs the hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis (HFPEA) model by integrating the attributes' preferences. Similarly, its dual form, linear transformation, and alternative improvement method are investigated respectively. Thus, based on the HFEA and HFPEA models, we can rank all the alternatives and improve the non-optimal ones according to the envelopment values and the obtained parameters. Meanwhile, the decision maker's subjective preferences for the attributes can be considered in the decision-making process. Finally, an illustrative example of bidding evaluation is provided to show the feasibility of the proposed decision-making approaches. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据