4.7 Article

Map matching for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories by exploring real-time moving directions

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 433, 期 -, 页码 55-69

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.031

关键词

Map matching; GPS data analysis; Location-based services

资金

  1. National Science Council [NSC 104-2221-E-194-043-MY2, 105-3011-E-194-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Map matching is the process of matching a series of recorded geographic coordinates (e.g., a GPS trajectory) to a road network. Due to GPS positioning errors and the sampling constraints, the GPS data collected by the GPS devices are not precise, and the location of a user cannot always be correctly shown on the map. Therefore, map matching is an important preprocessing step for many applications such as navigation systems, traffic flow analysis, and autonomous cars. Unfortunately, most current map-matching algorithms only consider the distance between the GPS points and the road segments, the topology of the road network, and the speed constraint of the road segment to determine the matching results. Moreover, most current map-matching algorithms cannot handle the matching errors at junctions. In this paper, we propose a spatio-temporal based matching algorithm (STD matching) for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories. STD-matching considers (1) the spatial features such as the distance information and topology of the road network, (2) the speed constraints of the road network, and (3) the real-time moving direction which shows the movement of the user. Moreover, we also reduce the running time by performing GPS clustering, GPS smoothing, and the A* shortest path algorithms. In our experiments, we compare STD-matching with three existing algorithms, the ST-matching algorithm, the stMM algorithm, and the HMM-RCM algorithm, using a real data set. The experiment results show that our STD-matching algorithm outperforms the three existing algorithms in terms of matching accuracy. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据