4.7 Article

A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters

期刊

INFORMATION FUSION
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 217-231

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.011

关键词

Large-scale group decision making (LGDM); Hesitant fuzzy element; Possibility distribution; Consensus; Local feedback strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671118, 71301110, 71501137, 71601134]
  2. International Visiting Program for Excellent Young Scholars of Sichuan University
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [skqy201525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the large-scale group decision making (LGDM) consensus process, it is usually assumed that the obtained clusters do not change. However, as the individual preferences change as part of the decision process, this is generally not the case. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to propose a LGDM consensus model in which the clusters are allowed to change and the decision makers provide preferences using fuzzy preference relations. The most commonly used clustering method, k-means, is introduced to identify the subgroups and a possibility distribution based hesitant fuzzy element (PDHFE) is employed to represent each cluster preference. A novel distance measure over the PDHFEs is given to compute the various consensus measures, after which a local feedback strategy with four identification rules and two direction rules is designed to guide the consensus reaching process. The proposed model is distinguished from previous studies where the changes occur on the obtained clusters that the feedback mechanism is directly based on the decision makers in the identified clusters. Further, as the clusters (virtual or nominal) change in every interactive consensus round, the consensus process evolution can be captured. Finally, an emergency decision to choose a rescue plan is illustrated to validate the proposed method and demonstrate distinctive characteristics compared with the existing approaches. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据