期刊
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 112-124出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2018.06.011
关键词
Systematic review; Requirements; Human errors; Taxonomy
资金
- National Science Foundation [1423279, 1421006]
- Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
- Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1423279] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
- Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1421006] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Background: Human-centric software engineering activities, such as requirements engineering, are prone to error. These human errors manifest as faults. To improve software quality, developers need methods to prevent and detect faults and their sources. Aims: Human error research from the field of cognitive psychology focuses on understanding and categorizing the fallibilities of human cognition. In this paper, we applied concepts from human error research to the problem of software quality. Method: We performed a systematic literature review of the software engineering and psychology literature to identify and classify human errors that occur during requirements engineering. Results: We developed the Human Error Taxonomy (HET) by adding detailed error classes to Reason's well-known human error taxonomy of Slips, Lapses, and Mistakes. Conclusion: The process of identifying and classifying human error identification provides a structured way to understand and prevent the human errors (and resulting faults) that occur during human-centric software engineering activities like requirements engineering. Software engineering can benefit from closer collaboration with cognitive psychology researchers.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据