4.5 Article

Anti-inflammatory effect and mechanism of the spirocyclopiperazinium salt compound LXM-15 in rats and mice

期刊

INFLAMMATION RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 363-370

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00011-017-1127-2

关键词

LXM-15; Anti-inflammation; alpha 7 nicotinic receptor; M4 muscarinic receptor; JAK2/STAT3 signalling pathway

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [7122097]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of a novel spirocyclopiperazinium salt compound LXM-15, and explore the underlying mechanisms. Xylene-induced mouse ear oedema and carrageenan-induced rat paw oedema tests were used to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of LXM-15. The protein levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, phosphorylation of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) were detected by ELISA or Western blot analysis. Additionally, receptor blocking test was performed to explore the possible target. Intragastric administration with LXM-15 (2, 1, 0.5 mg/kg in mice, and 6, 3, 1.5 mg/kg in rats) produced distinct anti-inflammatory effects in vivo, the highest inhibition percentage was 60 and 52%, respectively (P < 0.01). Following treatment with LXM-15 (6 mg/kg, i.g.), the levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6 in the rats paws were attenuated by 40 and 41%; and the phosphorylation of JAK2 and STAT3 was restrained by 35 and 45%, respectively (P < 0.01). All effects of LXM-15 were blocked by pretreatment with methyllycaconitine citrate or tropicamide. This study provides the first report that the spirocyclopiperazinium salt compound LXM-15 displays considerable anti-inflammatory effects. The underlying mechanism may be through activating the peripheral alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, leading to the inhibition of the JAK2/STAT3 signalling pathway, eventually resulting in the reduction of TNF-alpha and IL-6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据