4.4 Article

Two Phytoplasmas Elicit Different Responses in the Insect Vector Euscelidius variegatus Kirschbaum

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 86, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00042-18

关键词

Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris; flavescence doree phytoplasma; energy metabolism; immune response; leafhopper

资金

  1. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Torino, Turin (Italy)
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo
  3. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Torino
  4. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Asti

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytoplasmas are plant-pathogenic bacteria transmitted by hemipteran insects. The leafhopper Euscelidius variegatus is a natural vector of chrysanthemum yellows phytoplasma (CYp) and a laboratory vector of flavescence doree phytoplasma (FDp). The two phytoplasmas induce different effects on this species: CYp slightly improves whereas FDp negatively affects insect fitness. To investigate the molecular bases of these different responses, transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of E. variegatus infected with either CYp or FDp was performed. The sequencing provided the first de novo transcriptome assembly for a phytoplasma vector and a starting point for further analyses on differentially regulated genes, mainly related to immune system and energy metabolism. Insect phenoloxidase activity, immunocompetence, and body pigmentation were measured to investigate the immune response, while respiration and movement rates were quantified to confirm the effects on energy metabolism. The activation of the insect immune response upon infection with FDp, which is not naturally transmitted by E. variegatus, confirmed that this bacterium is mostly perceived as a potential pathogen. Conversely, the acquisition of CYp, which is naturally transmitted by E. variegatus, seems to increase the insect fitness by inducing a prompt response to stress. This long-term relationship is likely to improve survival and dispersal of the infected insect, thus enhancing the opportunity of phytoplasma transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据