4.7 Article

Extraction, purification, and bioactivities analyses of polysaccharides from Glycyrrhiza uralensis

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 596-608

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.011

关键词

Polysaccharides; Optimization; Characterization; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31460032, 81660581]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycyrrhiza uralensis is an important traditional Chinese herbal medicine. Polysaccharide is one of active components of G. uralensis. In this paper, the extraction conditions of crude polysaccharides from G. uralensis (GPsO) were optimized by central composite design (CCD), and Three purified polysaccharide fractions (GPs1, GPs2 and GPs3) were studied based on physicochemical property, monosaccharide composition, molecular weight, structures characteristics and antioxidant activities. Results showed that the yield of GPsO reached at the maximum of 4.23%, when the optimum extraction process was 1:13 g/mL (solid-liquid ratio), 600 W (ultrasonic power) at 70 degrees C for 85 min. Except for GPs2, the others (GPsO, GPs1 and GPs3) are non-reducing sugars. They don't contain starch. GPsO and GPs1 contain protein. The molecular weight, monosaccharide composition and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) assay showed that GPs1, GPs2 and GPs3 are pyran polysaccharides with a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of 4.513 x 10(3), 1.378 x 10(5) and 2.084 x 10(5) g/mol, respectively. GPs1, GPs2 and GPs3 mainly contain glucose and galactose, respectively. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) demonstrated that GPs1, GPs2 and GPs3 are flaky with a pore structure. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) displayed GPs1 and GPs2 have a large number of dispersions and a small amount of smaller globular aggregates, while GPs3 is the opposite of the abovementioned result. Besides, the antioxidant activity assay of these polysaccharides illustrated that GPs1 has a strong scavenging effect on DPPH radicals and superoxide radical.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据