4.7 Article

Antioxidant and anticoagulant activities of mycelia polysaccharides from Catathelasma ventricosurn after sulfated modification

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 53-60

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.064

关键词

Catathelasma ventricosum; Sulfation; Structural characterization; Directional modification; Antioxidant activity; Anticoagulant activity

资金

  1. Fund Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Education [16ZB0053]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580795]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of Sichuan Agricultural University [06021400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfated polysaccharides are known to possess excellent antioxidant and anticoagulant activities. The mycelial polysaccharides from Catathelasma ventricosum (mCVP-1S) was sulfated using sulphur trioxide-pyridine complex. Varying the reaction temperature, time and sulphur trioxide-pyridine complex (SO3 center dot Pyr) dosage altered the yield, degree of sulfation (DS), substitution and chain conformation of sulfated mCVP-1Ss (smCVP-1Ss). The yields and DS of the samples were ranging from 166 to 216 mg and from 0.18 to 0.56, respectively. Furthermore, FT-IR and NMR spectra showed that the sulfate groups had successfully introduced into mCVP-1S and mainly substituted in C-6 position. Congo red test revealed that mCVP-1S and most smCVP-1Ss had triple-helical structures. Especially, the smCVP-1S with DS of 0.28 and stable triple-helical structure showed the best antioxidant and anticoagulant abilities. Whereas, excessive substitution might destroy the triple-helical structure, and result in a sharply decrease of antioxidant and anticoagulant abilities. Besides, all smCVP-1Ss exhibited better antioxidant and anticoagulant abilities than native polysaccharides. The results suggest that the sulfated mycelial polysaccharides could be used as an alternative derivative of natural source of anticoagulant and antioxidant for industrial uses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据