4.7 Article

Application of HPLC fingerprint based on acid amide components in Chinese prickly ash (Zanthoxylum)

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 267-276

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.018

关键词

Zanthoxylum; HPLC fingerprint; Acid amide; Hierarchical clustering; Principal component analysis; Uncertainty and reliability

资金

  1. Scientific Fund of the Application Fundamental Project
  2. Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province, China [2016JY0118]
  3. Forestry Industry Standard Project Quality classify of Chinese prickly ash, State Forestry Administration of the People's Republic of China [2015LY184]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to establish a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fingerprint of Chinese prickly ash (zanthoxylvm) based on acid amide components, 38 specimen were collected from Western China. Similarity analysis, hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were carried out to analyze the obtained fingerprints. Furthermore, uncertainty and reliability values of the established HPLC fingerprints were evaluated. Similarity values ranged between 0.587 and 0.999 for specimen of Zanthoxyhim bimgeanum Maxim. and between 0.991 and 0.999 for specimen of Zanthoxyhim armatum DC. 17 samples from different habitats were classified by HCA into three groups, i.e. Group I (8 samples), Group II (6 samples) and Group III (3 samples) and were divided into three clusters by PCA. The compound of peak 6 was identified as hydroxyl-beta-sanshool. The characteristic compounds of peaks 5, 7, 8,10,12 and 13 were tentatively identified by LC-MS as other acid amide compounds. As for credibility analysis, the results showed that the values of macroscopic qualitative reliability and macroscopic quantitative reliability of the reference chromatogram fingerprint were more than 0.9772. Statistical analysis indicated that the HPLC fingerprint technology may be applied for quality assessment and classification of Zanthoxyhim.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据