4.3 Article

Mixing topics while studying does not enhance learning

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.003

关键词

Learning; Memory; Metacognition; Spacing; Interleaving; Mixing

资金

  1. James S. McDonnell foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to a recent survey, it is common for students to study two topics at the same time using flash-cards, and students who do so virtually always keep the topics separate instead of mixing flashcards together (Wissman, Rawson, & Pyc, 2012). We predicted that mixing might be a relatively easy way to increase learning efficiency because mixing increases the spacing between repetitions of a given item, and spacing enhances long-term learning. We compared two conditions: in the mixed condition, participants alternated on each trial between studying anatomy terms and Indonesian translations. In the unmixed condition they studied one topic and then the other. Items were interleaved within item-type in both conditions. Mixing did not have reliable effects when participants studied flashcards in a single day (Experiments 1 and 2) or on two different days (Experiments 3 and 4). Thus, the results seem to disconfirm two sets of beliefs: students' universal belief that mixing flashcards is undesirable and cognitive psychologists' belief that doing so should be encouraged. (C) 2014 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据