4.3 Review

T cell deficiencies as a common risk factor for drug associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

期刊

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
卷 223, 期 6-7, 页码 508-517

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2018.01.002

关键词

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; PML; JCV; CD4; CD8; IFN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a disease of the central nervous system caused by neuropathogenic prototypes of ubiquitous community-acquired JC virus (JCV). The disease became of particular concern following its association with certain therapies that modulate immune system function without heavy immunosuppression. Due to lack of prophylactic./treatment options and poor outcomes, which often include severe disability or death, PML is a considerable concern for development of new drugs that interfere with immune system functions. In this review of clinical and research findings, we discuss the evidence that deficiencies in CD4(+) T helper cells, cytotoxic CD8 T cells, and interferon gamma are of crucial importance for development of PML under a variety of circumstances, including those associated with use of various drugs, regardless of differences in their mechanisms of action. These deficiencies apparently enable transformation of the harmless JCV archetype into neuropathogenic prototypes, but the site(s), and the mechanisms, of this transformation are yet to be elucidated. Here we discuss the evidence for brain as one of the sites of this transformation, and propose a model of PML pathogenesis that emphasizes the central role of T cell deficiencies in the two life cycles of the JCV, one non-pathogenic and one neuropathogenic. Finally, we conclude that the development of clinical grade T cell functional tests and more consistent use of already available laboratory tests for T cell subset analysis would greatly aid the effort to more accurately predict and assess the magnitude of PML risk for concerned therapeutic interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据