4.4 Article

Parameter estimation of micro-motion targets for high-range-resolution radar using high-order difference sequence

期刊

IET SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 1-11

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-spr.2016.0504

关键词

radar resolution; radar signal processing; parameter estimation; high-range-resolution radar; high-order difference sequence; range alignment technique; rigid-body target; m-R signatures extraction; polynomial signal; sinusoidal signal; micro-motion period estimation method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61401486]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micro-range (m-R) signatures which are induced by micro-motion dynamics can be observed from range profiles, providing that the range resolution of radar is high enough. For real scenarios, micro-motion is often mixed with macro-motion (translation). To extract the micro-motion signatures, it is required to remove the macro-motion component. The widely employed range alignment technique fails for rigid-body targets with micro-motion, since the relative distances between different scattering centres on a rigid-body target are varying and it is unable to obtain a stable reference range profile. Thus, the extracted m-R signatures will be accompanied with residual macro-motion, which may lead to the degradation. However, this issue is often ignored in the research of m-R signatures extraction. In this work, by modelling the motions of scattering centres as the superimposition of a polynomial signal (represents macro-motion) and a sinusoidal signal (represents micro-motion), a micro-motion period estimation method based on high-order difference sequence is proposed. The property that the difference operation can decrease the order of polynomial signals while preserve sinusoidal signals with the same frequency enables the proposed method to extract m-R signatures in the presence of macro-motion. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated by synthetic and measured radar data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据