4.5 Article

Update battery model for photovoltaic application based on comparative analysis and parameter identification of lead-acid battery models behaviour

期刊

IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 484-493

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0409

关键词

lead acid batteries; photovoltaic power systems; parameter estimation; photovoltaic application; comparative analysis; parameter identification; lead-acid battery models behaviour; updated battery model; standalone photovoltaic systems simulation; standalone PV systems simulation; performance assessment; long-term energy prediction; parameter extraction procedure; sealed gelled lead-acid battery; discharge processes

资金

  1. laboratory of AEP team, in EER division of the UDES/CDER solar equipment development unit located in Bousmail/Tipaza

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy storage using electrochemical battery systems has been widely addressed as a key element to enable widespread integration of renewable energy. Here, an updated battery model is investigated in order to allow accurate standalone photovoltaic (PV) systems simulation, for performance assessment and long-term energy prediction. Battery models have been largely described in the literature. However, this study reviews the most commonly used models in PV application such as Shepherd, Manegon, and Coppetti models in order to validate the suitable mathematical model. The updated battery model based on experimental results and parameter extraction procedure is carried out using sealed gelled lead/acid battery during charge and discharge processes. A comparative analysis based on statistical tests and optimisation method confirms the effectiveness of the most accurate model among the three models using new proposed parameters. The simulation results of the model with new coefficients are compared with measured data, recorded from battery charge and discharge test bench to validate the accuracy of the updated model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据