4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Sensitive determination of uric acid by using graphene quantum dots as a new substrate for immobilisation of uric oxidase

期刊

IET NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 191-195

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0221

关键词

organic compounds; graphene devices; quantum dots; enzymes; biosensors; biochemistry; electrochemical electrodes; electrochemical sensors; transmission electron microscopy; scanning electron microscopy; voltammetry (chemical analysis); electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; nanomedicine; molecular biophysics; sensitive uric acid determination; graphene quantum dots; uric oxidase immobilisation; electrochemical detection; GQD; enzyme immobilisation; glassy carbon electrode; GCE; transmission electron microscope; scanning electron microscopy; cyclic voltammetry; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; electrochemical biosensor; C

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573200, 81373047, 81773480]
  2. Foundation of outstanding leaders training program of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai [PWRI2016-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel strategy for highly sensitive electrochemical detection of uric acid (UA) was proposed based on graphene quantum dots (GQDs), GQDs were introduced as a suitable substrate for enzyme immobilisation. Uric oxidase (UOx) was immobilised on GQDs modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Transmission electron microscope, scanning electron microscopy, cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy techniques were used for characterising the electrochemical biosensor. The developed biosensor responds efficiently to UA presence over the concentration linear range 1-800M with the detection limit 0.3M. This novel biosensing platform based on UOx/GQDs electrode responded even more sensitively than that based on GCE modified by UOx alone. The inexpensive, reliable and sensitive sensing platform based on UOx/GQDs electrode provides wide potential applications in clinical.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据