4.4 Article

Optimal operation of aggregated electric vehicle charging stations coupled with energy storage

期刊

IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 1127-1136

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0134

关键词

electric vehicle charging; power grids; power markets; vehicle-to-grid; aggregated electric vehicle charging stations; optimal operation; EV charging stations; parking places; commercial centres; power grid; energy storage system; arbitrage energy; time-variant EV energy demand; uncertain EV energy demand; offering-bidding strategy; day-ahead electricity market; ESS degradation; robust scheduling; price uncertainty; stochastic energy demand; cost savings

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1239408]
  2. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2014-09-3517]
  3. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1239408] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charging stations are the basic infrastructure for accommodating the energy needs of electric vehicles (EVs). Companies are expected to invest in these charging stations by installing them at locations with a dense concentration of vehicles, such as parking places, commercial centres, and workplaces. In order for investors in EV charging stations to maximise their profits and mitigate the impact on the power grid, these stations would benefit from coupling with an energy storage system (ESS). ESS would be used to arbitrage energy and to balance out the time-variant and uncertain EV energy demand. This study proposes a framework to optimise the offering/bidding strategy of an ensemble of charging stations coupled with ESS in the day-ahead electricity market. The proposed framework accounts for degradation of the ESS, robust scheduling against price uncertainty, as well as stochastic energy demand from EVs. The results show the viability of the proposed framework in providing cost savings to an ensemble of EV charging stations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据