4.4 Article

Proposed three ratios technique for the interpretation of mineral oil transformers based dissolved gas analysis

期刊

IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 2650-2661

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1927

关键词

transformer oil; minerals; chemical analysis; fault diagnosis; power transformer insulation; mineral oil transformer; dissolved gas analysis; incipient fault detection; oil-immersed transformers; Doernenburg ratio; Rogers ratio; IEC ratio; Duval triangle technique; transformer fault diagnosis; gas ratio concentration; interpretation technique; Egyptian Electricity Holding Company; IEC TC10; DGA ratio technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dissolved gas analysis (DGA) of oil is one of the major diagnostic tools that are used to detect the incipient faults of oil-immersed transformers through the correlation between the dissolved gases content in transformer oil and a particular malfunction. There are several techniques of DGA to interpret the incipient transformer faults such as Doernenburg ratio, Rogers's ratio, IEC ratio and Duval triangle techniques. This study presents a new proposed technique for transformer fault diagnosis using a new three gas ratios concentration of DGA to overcome the conflict that takes place in the traditional interpretation techniques. The accuracy of the proposed diagnosis technique is verified using practical DGA data obtained from 688 samples that have been collected from different transformers of different rating and different lifespan reported by Egyptian Electricity Holding Company, IEC TC10 and related databases surveyed from actual incident cases. The comparison with traditional DGA techniques showed that the proposed DGA ratio technique has good diagnosis accuracy. It is found that the suggested three ratios technique method has 99.86% accuracy as compared with 85.67% for Duval, 75.08% for Doernenburg, 47.34% for IEC and 39% for Rogers when testing 688 cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据