4.4 Article

Deep residual network with regularised fisher framework for detection of melanoma

期刊

IET COMPUTER VISION
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 1096-1104

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cvi.2018.5238

关键词

image segmentation; cancer; learning (artificial intelligence); medical image processing; image classification; feature extraction; neural nets; skin; within-class variance information; total class variance information; melanoma detection; residual network; regularised fisher framework; skin cancer; highest mortality rates; dermis layer; early stage; noninvasive methodology; conventional computational methods; segmentation; hand crafted feature computation; deep convolutional neural network-based; discriminant learning framework; low-dimensional discriminative features

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Of all the skin cancer that is prevalent, melanoma has the highest mortality rates. Melanoma becomes life threatening when it penetrates deep into the dermis layer unless detected at an early stage, it becomes fatal since it has a tendency to migrate to other parts of our body. This study presents an automated non-invasive methodology to assist the clinicians and dermatologists for detection of melanoma. Unlike conventional computational methods which require (expensive) domain expertise for segmentation and hand crafted feature computation and/or selection, a deep convolutional neural network-based regularised discriminant learning framework which extracts low-dimensional discriminative features for melanoma detection is proposed. Their approach minimises the whole of within-class variance information and maximises the total class variance information. The importance of various subspaces arising in the within-class scatter matrix followed by dimensionality reduction using total class variance information is analysed for melanoma detection. Experimental results on ISBI 2016, MED-NODE, PH2 and the recent ISBI 2017 databases show the efficacy of their proposed approach as compared to other state-of-the-art methodologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据