4.7 Article

Deep Learning for Infrared Thermal Image Based Machine Health Monitoring

期刊

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 151-159

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2017.2722479

关键词

Fault detection; machine learning algorithms; neural networks; preventive maintenance

资金

  1. Vlaamse innovatiesamenwerkingsverband Operations and Maintenance (VIS O&M) Excellence project of Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship (VLAIO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The condition of a machine can automatically be identified by creating and classifying features that summarize characteristics of measured signals. Currently, experts, in their respective fields, devise these features based on their knowledge. Hence, the performance and usefulness depends on the expert's knowledge of the underlying physics or statistics. Furthermore, if new and additional conditions should be detectable, experts have to implement new feature extraction methods. To mitigate the drawbacks of feature engineering, a method from the subfield of feature learning, i.e., deep learning (DL), more specifically convolutional neural networks (NNs), is researched in this paper. The objective of this paper is to investigate if and how DL can be applied to infrared thermal (IRT) video to automatically determine the condition of the machine. By applying this method on IRT data in two use cases, i.e., machinefault detection and oil-level prediction, we show that the proposed system is able to detect many conditions in rotating machinery very accurately (i.e., 95 and 91.67% accuracy for the respective use cases), without requiring any detailed knowledge about the underlying physics, and thus having the potential to significantly simplify condition monitoring using complex sensor data. Furthermore, we show that by using the trained NNs, important regions in the IRT images can be identified related to specific conditions, which can potentially lead to new physical insights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据