4.7 Article

Data Fusion Method Based on Mutual Dimensionless

期刊

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 506-517

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2017.2759791

关键词

Data fusion; each dimensionless; fault diagnosis; support vector machine (SVM)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61473331, 61471133, 61174113, 61272382]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2014A030307049, 2017B030311008]
  3. Ordinary University Innovation of Guangdong Province of China [2015KTSCX094]
  4. Sail Plan Training High-level Talents of Guangdong Province of China
  5. Science and Technology Plan of Guangdong Province of China [2015B020233019, 2017A070712024]
  6. Annual Scientific and Technological Innovation Special Fund [pdjh2016b0341]
  7. Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology College Students' Innovation Incubation Project [2015pyA006]
  8. Science and Technology Project of Guangzhou [201604010099, 2016B030306002, 2016B030308001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since data fusion in the process of the traditional fault diagnosis method is not accurate enough, it is difficult to use the dimensionless index to distinguish among fault types of problems. This paper proposes a data fusion method based on mutual dimensionless. This method uses real-time acquisition of original data and dimensionless calculations, obtains five dimensionless indices for each dataset, and then uses support vector machine (SVM) model projections for the dataset to judge fault types. Using dimensionless indices to process raw data, the SVM method for training can more effectively solve the problem due to the imperfection of the old dimensionless index leading to a low accuracy of fault diagnosis. Using a petrochemical rotary machinery experiment, the accuracy of the method of fault diagnosis is higher; in a single experiment, the fault detection accuracy can reach 100%, where compared with the traditional dimensionless index data fusion method, the accuracy is increased by 20.74%. The method has stronger ability to judge failures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据