4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Backscatter Multiplicative Multiple-Access Systems: Fundamental Limits and Practical Design

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 5713-5728

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2018.2849372

关键词

Ambient backscatter communication; multiple-access system; multiplicative multiple-access channel; achievable rate region analysis

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [FL160100032, DP150104019]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571100, 61631005, 61628103, 61601100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we consider a novel ambient backscatter multiple-access system, where a receiver (Rx) simultaneously detects the signals transmitted from an active transmitter (Tx) and a backscatter tag. Specifically, the information-carrying signal sent by the Tx arrives at the Rx through two wireless channels: the direct channel from the Tx to the Rx and the backscatter channel from the Tx to the tag and then to the Rx. The received signal from the backscatter channel also carries the tag's information because of the multiplicative backscatter operation at the tag. This multiple-access system introduces a new channel model referred to as backscatter multiplicative multiple-access channel (BM-MAC). We analyze the achievable rate region of the BM-MAC and prove that its region is strictly larger than that of the conventional time-division multiple-access scheme in many cases, including, e.g., the high SNR regime and the case when the direct channel is much stronger than the backscatter channel. Hence, the multiplicative multiple-access scheme is an attractive technique to improve the throughput for ambient backscatter communication systems. Moreover, we analyze the detection error rates for coherent and noncoherent modulation schemes adopted by the Tx and the tag, respectively, in both synchronous and asynchronous scenarios, which further bring interesting insights for practical system design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据