4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Distance-Based Inter-Cell Interference Coordination in Small Cell Networks: Stochastic Geometry Modeling and Analysis

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 4089-4103

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2018.2819998

关键词

Stochastic geometry; Poisson point process; small cell networks; interference; edge user; interference coordination

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2017R1A2B4008581]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4008581] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a distance-based inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC) scheme in small cell networks (SCNs). While most of the previous works focus on a randomly selected user called a typical user, we focus on an edge user because the main purpose of ICIC is to improve the performance of an edge user. Since there are many inactive small cell base stations (SBSs) in SCNs, a simple criterion for an edge user such as being located near a cell boundary is not appropriate for SCNs. To accurately detect edge users experiencing severe performance degradation, we newly define an edge user in SCNs based on the nearest active neighbor SBS. We then apply our scheme only to edge users where SBSs within so-called the cooperation radius from each edge user cooperate. With the help of the stochastic geometry we obtain a semi-closed expression for the coverage probability of an edge user with our scheme. We investigate two tradeoffs on the resource efficiency of a network and the coverage probability of an interior user. We then determine the optimal cooperation radius that maximizes the coverage probability of an edge user considering the two tradeoffs. Our analytical results are validated through simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据