4.7 Article

Secrecy Outage of Max-Min TAS Scheme in MIMO-NOMA Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 67, 期 8, 页码 6981-6990

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2824310

关键词

Non-orthogonal multiple access; multiple-input multiple-output; secrecy outage probability; transmit antenna selection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61471076, 61701066]
  2. Chinese Scholarship Council [201607845004]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_16R72]
  4. special fund for Key Laboratory of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission
  5. Project of Fundamental and Frontier Research Plan of Chongqing [cstc2017jcyjAX0204, cstc2015jcyjBX0085]
  6. Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJ1600413, KJ1704088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper considers a secure nonorthogonal multiple access system, where confidential messages are transmitted from a base station to multiple legitimate destinations and wiretapped by multiple illegitimate receivers. It is assumed that all the channels experience a Nakagami-m fading model and all the nodes are equipped with multiple antennas, respectively. Both noncolluding and colluding eavesdroppers are considered, respectively. A max-min (MM) transmit antenna selection (TAS) strategy is adopted to improve the secrecy performance of the target system, in which both users in user paring are considered simultaneously. In particular, closed-form expressions for the cumulative distribution function of the signal-to-interference-noise ratio at the legitimate user are derived first. Then, we obtain the exact and asymptotic analytical results in a closed form for the secrecy outage probability of an MM TAS scheme. Monte Carlo simulation results are presented to corroborate the correctness of the analysis. The results show that the secrecy diversity order is zero and nonzero for fixed and dynamic power allocations, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据